351

 The result was announced-yeas 24, nays 69 as follows: [Rolleall Vote No. 36 Ex.]
 YEA-2 4
Allen Gain Roth Bartlett Goldwater Schmitt Belimon Griffin Schweiker Byrd, Harry F., Jr. Hatch Scott Curtis Helms Stevens Dole Laxalt Tower Domenic! Lugar Wallop Eastland McClure Young


Abourezk Anderson Baker Bayh Bentsen Bliden Brooke Burdick Byrd, Robert C. Cannon Case Chafee Chiles Church Clark Cranston Culver Danf orth DeConcini Durkin Eagleton Ford Glenn Gravel


 NAYS-6f
Hart Haskell Hatfield, Hatfield, Mark 0 Hatfield, Paul G. Hathaway Hayakawa Heinz Ilodges Hollings Iluddleston Humphrey lnouye Jackson Javits Johnston Kennedy Leahy Long Magnuson Mlatsuna ga McIntyre Melcher Metzenbaum


 NOT VOTNG-7
Bumpers McGovern H-ansen Morgan Mathias Stennis So Mr. Scott's amendment was rejected.


Moynihan Muskie Nelson Nunn Packwood Pearson Pell
Percy Proxmire Randolph Ribicoff Riegle Sarbanes Sasser Sparkman Stafford Stevenson Stone Talmadge Weicker Williams Zoriusky


Thurmond


 Amendment No. 45 (Allen, et al.), February 28, 1978 (Congressional Record, S 2503-04) -Tabled 57-38.
 Sumnmary.-Provided for a continued U.S. military presence in the Panama Canal Zone area beyond December 31, 1999, if on that date the United States w as at war with any nation which might seek to have its warships transit the Canal under the Neutrality Treaty. Such military presence would not extend more than sixty days beyond the end of the state of war.

Text:.
 ARTICLE, I
 The Republic of Panama declares that the Canal, as in international transit waterway, shall be permanently neutral in accordance with the regime established in this Treaty. The same regime of neutrality shall apply to any other international waterway that may be built either partially or wholly in the territory of the Republic of Panama: Provided, That the military presence of the United States in what was