SUPREME COURT OF THE CANAL ZONE.

It may be further stated that the attorney for appellant, Louis Habib, states in the conclusion of his brief herein that the evidence was not sufficient to establish the fact that defendants, Habib, Nahas & Company, was in fact a partnership and appellant also contends that the evidence was not sufficient to show that said Bodin was a member of said partnership or was a duly authorized agent thereof at the time of the borrowing of the money from the plaintiffs so as to make the defendants liable therefor, but these were questions of fact that were all presented to and considered by the court below and these findings of fact we are not disposed to disturb.
It follows that the judgment of the court below must be and the same is hereby affirmed with all costs to the plaintiffs-appellees.
Affirmed.
CLARKE, Administrator, versus THE McCLINTIC-MARSHALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.
No. 128. Argued February 16, 1914. Decided March 30, 1914.
WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE.
It is not the province of the Supreme Court to reverse a case on the facts unless the findings of the trial court were plainly and manifestly against the weight of the evidence.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit; Hon. H. A. Gudger, Judge.
The facts appear in the opinion.
W. H. Carrington and V. G. De Suze, for appellant. W. C. Todd, for appellee.
JACKSON, J. This is an action wherein the plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Henry Clarke, deceased, sought to recover the sum of $15,000 damages on account of the death of the said Henry Clarke at Miraflores on or about the 7th day of January, 1913.
The allegations of negligence as set forth in the complaint are substantially that on or about the 7th of January, 1913, the deceased was in the employ of the Isthmian Canal Commission as a "concrete man" working inthe bed of the locks at Miraflores,

278