SUPREME COURT OF THE CANAL ZONE.

her possession of the premises, and stated that he would move out as quickly as he could do so. This the plaintiff denies and says he made to her an offer to vacate the premises and place her in possession if she would refund to him $75 rent advanced by him.
The lower court found upon this evidence that Mrs. Weaver did not get possession of the property and had no opportunity to acquire the same, save and except on the condition set forth by the tenant Richardson. Upon these facts the court allowed her damages equal to the actual traveling expenses from Colon to Arizona and return, namely, $596. From this judgment the defendant appealed to this court.
It is unnecessary to enter into a lengthy argument with regard to the law governing such cases. It seems clear that a contract was made, that the same waF within the jurisdiction of this court, that it was violated upon the part of the defendants herein, and that Mrs. Weaver was entitled to damages. The record discloses no error; and
It is therefore ordered and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be in all respects affirmed, and that the case be remanded to the circuit court for such orders as may be deemed necessary.
Affirmed.
THULL, Administrator versus THE PANAMA RAILROAD
COMPANY.
No. 112. Argued May 14, 1913. Decided May 27, 1913.
NEGLIGENCE. LESSOR AND LESSEE. RAILROADS. The lessor is not liable to the servant of the lessee for injuries received in the line of service required of him in operating a railroad.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit; Hon. William H. Jackson, Judge.
The facts appear in the opinion.
Felix E. Porter, for appellant. Frank Feuille and Charles R. Williams, for appellees.
H. A. GUDGER, C. J. This action was tried in the Second Judicial Circuit, and from the judgment entered an appeal was taken to this court. The record is long and tedious, but the essential facts are sufficiently stated.

204