SUPREME COURT OF THE CANAL AONE.

uncorroborated evidence is not sufficient to justify a conviction.
From the record it is rather difficult to form an opinion on that subject. The facts set forth, however, tend to establish the contrary view. Admitting that he willingly participated in the crime, it seems that his statements were in a substantial manner corroborated by two other witnesses. One of them in an adjoining room saw and heard things which prompted him to report to the police authorities that criminal conduct was going on in the room occupied by the defendant, who at the time, was in the room. When the official came, he found such a state of affairs as shocks one's sensibility.
The evidence of these witnesses shows that a crime had been committed, or attempted, and connects the defendant directly with its commission.
While due weight should be and has been given to this case, and the facts and circumstances have been looked into carefully to see if any injustice has been done the accused, we do not think it is productive of any good to enter into a fuller discussion of a question of such revolting character, or to make a more detailed statement of the evidence.
We affirm the sentence of the court below for the reason that the testimony, in our judgment, is sufficient to justify the finding of the court.
JUSTICE COLLINS concurred.
Affirmed.

Apr. Term:,

IOW22