DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CANAL ZONE. The respective amounts to be paid by the cargo and the vessel has been based upon what the court considered a fair division, taking into consideration the payment of over $2,500 for the use of the tug, and the wages of the seamen and crew while engaged in the work of rescue, which would make the award something over $18,000, and would entail about the same sum on the cargo owner and the tug owner. The motion to increase will be overruled. The libellants will receive the amounts, respectively, set out in the memorandum attached hereto, which respective amounts will be copied into and made a part of the judgment of the court. And the final decree of this court shall make a total award of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for the libellants, and the master and members of the crew of the tug Gorgona interested as salvors, which shall be proportioned among the various parties so interested. Ex parte DEAL. (District Court, Canal Zone, Cristobal Division, December 17, 1921.) Civil No. 384. 1. ALIENS. DEPORTATION. Where a sailor enters the Canal Zone in violation of the quarantine and immigration regulations, goes to Colon, Republic of Panama, and establishes residence there, and it is shown that he is an undesirable person, he may be arrested in Colon, brought into the Canal Zone, and on due proceedings for deportation be deported. 2. ALIENS. QUARANTINE AND IMMIGRATION REGULATIONS. NOTICE. Persons coming into the Canal Zone are charged with notice of all regulations with respect to entry into the Zone, and a person who enters the Zone in violation of such regulations may be deported if thereafter found lh the Zone. 3. ARREST. LEGALITY. Tbe court, will not inquire into or consider the question as to whether the defendant was kidnapped or illegally arrested in Colon and brought into the Zone. The fact that he is in custody in the Zone gives the court jurisdic-' tion no matter how his presence on the Zone was obtained. 4. HABEAS CORPUS. WRIT OF REVIEW. Habeas Corpus may not be resorted to for the purpose of freeing a person from detention under an order of deportation where the defendant has been granted a hearing amounting to due process of law culminating in a legal order of deportation. This writ may not be sued as a writ of review to correct errors. Attorneys for petitioner, Todd and McIntyre. Attorneys for the Government, A. C. Hindman, United States District Attorney and J. J. McGuigan, Assistant District Attorney. KERR, District judge. The applicant, Elmer Frank Deal, is now in custody of the police at Cristobal, and is held on an order of