TABLE PAGE
4-10 F families (F plants) which segregated for variegated tesa color and nodulation analyzed by
chi-square test for goodness-of-fit to the expected
ratio with the appropriate crossover percentage.... 60
4-11 F1BC segregation for variegated testa color and nodulation with the observed frequency analyzed by chi-square test for goodness-of-fit to the expected
ratio with the appropriate crossover percentage.... 61
4-12 A comparison of testa variegation of F2 plants with segregation for nodulation in the F3 and chi-square tests for goodness-of-fit to the expected ratio of
parental, crossover, and two crossover types with
the appropriate crossover percentage............... 62
4-13 A comparison of testa variegation of F BC plants with segregation for nodulation in the F2 C and
chi-square tests for goodness-of-fit to the expected ratio of parental and crossover types with
the appropriate crossover percentage............... 64
5-1 A description of the peanut lines used as parents in crosses made to investigate the inheritance
of non-nodulation and testa color.................. 68
5-2 The method used to adjust the data in Table 5-6 to correct for incomplete penetrance.................. 70
5-3 The method used to adjust the data in Table 5-8 to correct for incomplete penetrance.................. 71
5-4 Segregation for red and pink testa color with chisquare test for goodness-of-fit to the expected
ratio.............................................. 72
5-5 F2 segregation of testa color and variegation analyzed by chi-square test for goodness-of-fit
to the expected ratio with independent segregation
of the two loci R2 and V........................... 74
5-6 F segregation of testa color and nodulation with t~e adjusted frequency analyzed by chi-square test
for goodness-of-fit to the expected ratio with
independent segregation of the three loci, NI, N2,
and R2 .......................... .................. 75
5-7 Segregation for white and tinted vareigation testa
color with chi-square test for goodness-of-fit to
the expected ratio................................. 76
viii