-74-


*ow ;>, yi o."ire' o7 t: conmny an.~ the shoo a's conCucteC as a coopera-
tive. Still others .i8 liO e'ise anr the ii:Custr- --as faced -'ith a
brea2,k'on of hour sciheules by the subte'.ue of men claimin,. to be com-
pany officers. -Rnce the JurT)ose of the first )roposol.

 Agnin in an earlier chW other it is pointed out that this industry
vas not statistically fnct minded, nor realize thie value of such material.
The Code in its e--oroved, form vas not' ecniLte-, not a.s eX:plicit in this
respect as it 'mi 7ht have been, maina- it difficult to obtain necessary
pertinent infoQrmtion. It ': s felt this 'Oro oo sedc. chen.e -as necessary.

 A chi-nie 'as -oenCin- in tU. set' u- of this Coee's definition, also
ne.-otiations for a cor:solidation of a -roaop thi-t -had oeen -oart of the
Lu,;' :e Industrr '.ith the. Hpn".bL.- Code Auithorit. ha been -.bout concluded.
In th.t group sellin.- terms 86 been estnblished oPl withoutt chan-e for
me.n,2,T veers. It -'as, necessrirr thn.t thle -ro.'osed. -mencemnt respecting
terms o0 brou.Tht before tie AcministrTtor for ,r-,roml. This served. to
ro.)en the '-hole cuostion of Disco.aints see pages 10 to 83 of Transcript
of TerinTr., ?ebrL1r-r-.- 283, 193:5.

 Th'e 7ree Deals Combir.tion Deals prbOos ,-1 P f"elt necessr-.r be-
cnuse of the .-o"in: deri nrds Q-' retailers for all. sorts of free thin-s,
iritials for -:::aQ-le. It was but another form of, hi vin --- the C.evil
aro-n.. the stump. See oa *es 83 to 86- oQf the Trai.scriot Public Hearing,
eo,'ru.- 28, 1935.

 In concl-cinr: this chzoter it is ";ell to state that the t"o amend-
ments a'oroveO. nd those -oroloseJ had ao .-oo. effect uipoo. indi1st-ry. It
'"rs made ':io n to ineustr- b o-iblication and ,ord. of mouth, '-hat the
Code Authority ras doing and there cane about a fe.-lin:, that their Code
Authority iwas on its toes, tc:cklinf troublesome -)roblems in a -oainstaking
thought ful manner. All dii not aree in detail rith conclusions reached,
but it :as felt and believed that -ri.ht thinin ha.d oeen develonee 17ith
a quieting stabilizing effect.

 2. Interpretations

 (a) There vTas but one interpretation made under this Code
(Administrative Order Ho. S32-10), .Aated June '6, 1934 signed Earl Dean
Ho"ard, De.-ut, Arministretor and Sol A. Rosenblatt, Division Administra-
tor, Division io. 5. (See 2S.-ibit S.)

 The question raised ras that of the inclusion of a certain
process of manufacture, the lin'zin,. together of niunerous nieces of lea-
ther, under the term "'and crochetinc". Could it Leave been so included l.t
followed that under Section 10 of Article V, such ork wouldd have been
permitted' in the hoqe.

 Sirce the irterpretotion didA not include it under "hand
crochetin-" it bee'-ne a process Forji6'Cen for home or-..

 (b) Effect on Indust ., ;

 I believe some question 7as later risee' Ps to the sound-
ness or this opinion. Some thought it a vise thing to have included it
9811