The Sun/Sunday, February 16, 2014 VIEWPOINT www.sunnewspapers.net C OurTown Page 9 A lawsuit's strange twist en. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has been caught using pur- loined passages in several of his speeches. Now the aspiring presidential candidate stands accused of filing a lawsuit stolen from its author. Since December, the libertarian lawmaker, a tea party favorite, had been working with former Reagan adminis- tration lawyer Bruce Fein to draft a class-action suit seeking to have the National Security Agency's surveillance of telephone data declared unconstitutional. But when Paul filed his suit at the U.S. District Court in Washington on Wednesday morning, Fein's name had been replaced with that of Ken Cuccinelli, the failed Republican gubernatorial candidate in Virginia who until last month had been the state's attorney general. Cuccinelli has never argued a case in that courthouse, and he isn't even a member of the D.C. bar (he also filed a motion Wednesday seeking an exception to allow him to argue this case in D.C.). But he is, like Paul, a tea party darling. Fein, who has not been paid in full for his legal work by Paul's political action committee, was furious that he had been omitted from the filing he wrote. "I am aghast and shocked by Ken Cuccinelli's behavior and his absolute knowledge that this entire complaint was the work product, intellectual property and legal genius of Bruce Fein," Mattie Fein, his ex- wife and spokeswoman, told me Wednesday. "Ken Cuccinelli stole the suit," she said, adding that Paul, who "already has one plagiarism issue, now has a lawyer who just takes another lawyer's work product." After the morning news conference announcing the suit, Cuccinelli told me that "Bruce Fein will be brought in later." But a Jan. 15 draft of the complaint written by Fein has long passages that are nearly identical to those in the com- plaint Cuccinelli filed Wednesday. Except for some cuts and minor wording changes, they are clearly the same documents. For example, Fein's version said, "When the MATP was disclosed by Edward Snowden, public opinion polls showed widespread opposition to the dragnet collection, storage, retention, and search of telephony metadata collected on every domestic or inter- national phone call made or received by citizens or permanent resident aliens in the United States." Cuccinelli's version said, "Since the MATP was publicly disclosed, public opinion polls showed widespread opposition to the drag- net collection, storage, retention, and search of telephone metadata col- lected on every domestic or international phone call made or received by citizens or permanent resident aliens in the United States." Fein wrote: "On information and belief, Defendants' Mass Associational Tracking Program since its com- mencement in May 2006 has not stopped or been instrumental in stopping even one imminent inter- national terrorist attack or has otherwise assisted Defendants in achiev- ing any time-sensitive objective." Cuccinelli's version: "Upon information and belief, since its com- mencement in May 2006, Defendants' Mass Associational Tracking Program has not stopped or been instrumental in stopping even one imminent international terrorist attack or other- wise assisted Defendants in achieving any time-sensitive objective." The unceremonious jettisoning of a constitu- tional lawyer in favor of the man best known for his unsuccessful suit to have Obamacare declared unconstitutional suggests that Paul's legal action has more to do with politics than the law. And there are other clues. In Fein's version, Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., was listed as a plaintiff along with Paul, but in the final complaint the Democrat was gone and the tea party group FreedomWorks was added in his place. Both suits list as defendants the director of national intelligence, the FBI director and the director of the NSA, but Fein's version had named the defense secretary and the attorney general. Cuccinelli's version dropped those two but added President Obama as a defendant, an incen- diary change. A Paul adviser said Fein was paid $15,000 and that "multiple attorneys" were involved in the complaint. Behind the scenes, Paul's team reacted angrily to Fein's accusations. Doug Stafford, Paul's top political operative, sent Fein an email Wednesday afternoon saying he expected Fein would be involved in the future, but he criticized Fein for complaining publicly. "That is crazy and makes no sense if your interest is to work as part of the team. None," he wrote. Cuccinelli, meanwhile, complained in a separate email to Fein that "our clients don't want the lawyers to become the story." When Mattie Fein responded in an email to Cuccinelli calling him "dumb as a box of rocks," Cuccinelli wrote another email to Bruce Fein say- ing, "I think this relation- ship is untenable." Paul, for his part, canceled plans to have an afternoon conference call with reporters. Dana Milbank is a Washington Post colum- nist. Readers may reach him at danamilbank@ washpost.com. Writing off the unemployed ack in 1987 my Princeton col- league Alan Blind- er published a very good book titled "Hard Heads, Soft Hearts." It was, as you might guess, a call for tough-minded but compassionate econom- ic policy. Unfortunately, what we actually got - especially, although not only, from Republi- cans was the opposite. And it's difficult to find a better example of the hardhearted, softheaded nature of today's GOP than what happened last week, as Senate Repub- licans once again used the filibuster to block aid to the long-term unem- ployed. What do we know about long-term unem- ployment in America? First, it's still at near-record levels. Historically, the long- term unemployed - those out of work for 27 weeks or more have usually been between 10 and 20 percent of total unemployment. Today the number is 35.8 percent. Yet extended unemployment benefits, which went into effect in 2008, have been allowed to lapse. As a result, few of the long-term unemployed are receiving any kind of support. Second, if you think the typical long-term unemployed American is one of Those People- nonwhite, poorly educat- ed, etc. you're wrong, according to research by the Urban Institute's Josh Mitchell. Half of the long-term unemployed are non-Hispanic whites. College graduates are less likely to lose their jobs than workers with less education, but once they do they are actually a bit more likely than others to join the ranks of the long-term un- employed. And workers older than 45 are espe- cially likely to spend a long time unemployed. Third, in a weak job market long-term unemployment tends to be self-perpetuating, because employers in ef- fect discriminate against the jobless. Many people have suspected that this was the case, and last year Rand Ghayad of Northeastern University provided a dramatic con- firmation. He sent out thousands of fictitious r6sum6s in response to job ads, and found that potential employers were drastically less likely to respond if the fictitious applicant had been out of work more than six months, even if he or she was better qualified than other applicants. What all of this suggests is that the long-term unemployed are mainly victims of circumstances ordi- nary American workers who had the bad luck to lose their jobs (which can happen to anyone) at a time of extraordinary labor market weakness, with three times as many people seeking jobs as there are job openings. Once that happened, the very fact of their unem- ployment made it very hard to find a new job. So how can politicians justify cutting off modest financial aid to their unlucky fellow citizens? Some Republicans justified last week's filibuster with the tired old argument that we can't afford to increase the deficit. Actually, Democrats paired the benefits extension with measures to increase tax receipts. But in any case this is a bizarre objection at a time when federal deficits are not just falling, but clearly falling too fast, holding back economic recovery. For the most part, however, Republicans justify refusal to help the unemployed by asserting that we have so much long-term unemployment because people aren't trying hard enough to find jobs, and that extended benefits are part of the reason for that lack of effort. People who say things like this people like, for example, Sen. Rand Paul probably imagine that they're being tough-minded and realistic. In fact, how- ever, they're peddling a fantasy at odds with all the evidence. For exam- ple: if unemployment is high because people are unwilling to work, reducing the supply of labor, why aren't wages going up? But evidence has a well-known liberal bias. The more their economic doctrine fails re- member how the Fed's actions were supposed to produce runaway inflation? the more fiercely conservatives cling to that doctrine. More than five years after a financial crisis plunged the Western world into what looks increasingly like a quasi-permanent slump, making nonsense of free-market orthodoxy, it's hard to find a leading Republican who has changed his or her mind on, well, anything. And this impervious- ness to evidence goes along with a stunning lack of compassion. If you follow debates over unemployment, it's striking how hard it is to find anyone on the Republican side even hinting at sympathy for the long-term jobless. Being unemployed is always presented as a choice, as something that only happens to losers who don't really want to work. Indeed, one often gets the sense that contempt for the unemployed comes first, that the supposed justifications for tough policies are after-the-fact rationalizations. The result is that mil- lions of Americans have in effect been written off - rejected by potential employers, abandoned by politicians whose fuzzy-mindedness is matched only by the hardness of their hearts. Paul Krugman is a columnist for The New York Times. He can be reached via www.new yorktimes.com. Obama's lawmaking from on high We were told that President Barack Obama would wield his executive power this year to defy Congress. Instead, he is defying his own health care law. The Obama admin- istration announced this week it is delaying and changing the law's employer mandate, the latest in a series of seat- of-the-pants revisions to Obamacare. The president was eager to highlight steps he was taking to bypass Congress in his State of the Union last month, but left this one out. If he OF.T.M. .T. rM2 had demanded congres- sional action to delay the employer mandate, he surely would have gotten a bipartisan bill on his desk forthwith. His call for executive unilateral- ism should be amended: "Even if Congress will act ... I still prefer to act on my own. Congress long ago ced- ed too much authority to the regulatory apparatus of the administrative state, but this is different. This is the executive branch affirmatively re- writing law in defiance of our constitutional system and the rule of law. Obamacare is quite clear that the employer mandate "shall apply" after Dec. 31, 2013. Nonetheless, the Obama administration delayed it for a year last July. The latest move is even more brazen. It creates a distinction between employers with fewer and more than 100 em- ployees that doesn't exist in the law, and delays the mandate for another year for businesses with 50-99 employees. At the same time, it changes the obligation on em- ployers with more than 100 employees. These aren't waivers or delays, but detailed revisions. Last year, the Treasury Department justified the delay as "transition relief," a euphemism right up there with "shared responsibility payments," the administration's favored term for fines on employers. The examples that the department cites of prior transition relief LOWRY110 WxceZIC(3ce ,< zet %0Z/ozmett 4 <- <%^ MY DENTIST USED A LASER TO TREATY SBad Breath, IBleeding Gums DR. SUSAN R. BROOKS New Palienis 69 4 Welcome 629-4311 www.susanrbrooksdds.com General Dentistry Implants Cosmetic Nitrous Oxide *Dentures & One Day Repair S Laser Periodontal Therapy 3440 Conway Blvd. 92A ih -i. Pi I i.i. :-i Porl Charlolle Routine Annual Visits Laparoscopy Surgeries Hysteroscopic Procedures Bladder & Rectal Prolapse repair Treatment Of Abnormal Bleeding Diagnosis & Treatment Of Urinary Incontinence Now Accepting New Patients. Please Call For An Appointment O Yasmeen M. Islam, MD Board Certified Obstetrics & Gynecology 941.625.5855 HARBOR PROFESSIONAL CENTER S 3400 Tamiamrni Trail, Suite #102, Port Charlotte