following Al within the 6-second period). One subject was

excluded from the LH NC group due to unusually high and

variable heart rate. Figure C-1, C-2 and C-3 depict the

heart rate wave forms in half second intervals for the NCS,

RHD, and LHD subjects respectively.

 Average heart raze change from baseline was examined

using repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) for

the shock condition with group as the between subjects

factor (LHD, LH NCS, RHD, RH NCS) and condition (shock, no-

shock) as the within subject factor. The analyses

revealed no group differences [F(3,43) = 1.55, P = .214] as

well as no differences between the shock and no-shock

conditions [F(1,43) = .050, P = .824]. The interaction of

group and condition was also not significant [F(3,43) =

.927, P = .436]. The means for each group were as follows:

LHD mean=-.558, sd=.985; LH NCS mean=-.130, sd=.650; RHD

mean=.139, sd=1.556; RH NCS mean=-.121, sd=l.01. The

complete ANOVA table is depicted in Table C-5 of Appendix C.

 Heart rate D1 was examined using repeated measures

analyses of variance ANOVAS) with group (LHD, LH NCS, RHD,

RH NCS) as the between subject factor. The two within

subject factors were block (1 to 4) and condition (shock and

no-shock). Analysis of D1 revealed that there was a

significant three way interaction between group, condition,

and block [F(9,43) = 2.09, P < 05]. Money of the other

interactions or main effects were significant. The full