%PDF-1.3
%
1 0 obj
<><><>]/ON[24 0 R]/Order[]/RBGroups[]>>/OCGs[24 0 R]>>/PageMode/UseNone/Pages 2 0 R/Type/Catalog>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>/Font<>>>/Fields 28 0 R>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
2013-03-25T14:02:52-04:00
2012-05-21T12:14:38-04:00
2013-03-25T14:02:52-04:00
application/pdf
uuid:9e8e6bc4-46b8-4ee4-a814-2649a1f2c5c9
uuid:3681aac8-74d8-430b-9c78-9113e618c9ca
endstream
endobj
2 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB]/XObject<>>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
79 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/T1_0 10 Tf
51 747 Td
(Economic Impact of Agriculture and Agribusiness in Miami-Dade County, Fl\
orida: A Summary)Tj
ET
q
1 0 0 1 51 745 cm
0 0 m
510 0 l
510 -1 l
S
Q
q
1 0 0 1 51 744 cm
0 0 m
510 0 l
S
Q
q
1 0 0 1 51 745 cm
0 0 m
0 -1 l
S
Q
q
1 0 0 1 51 745 cm
0 0 m
510 0 l
510 -1 l
S
Q
q
1 0 0 1 51 744 cm
0 0 m
510 0 l
S
Q
q
1 0 0 1 51 745 cm
0 0 m
0 -1 l
S
Q
BT
/T1_0 10 Tf
553 747 Td
(3)Tj
/T1_1 11 Tf
-502 -28 Td
(livestock\) have shown remarkably different patterns )Tj
0 -14 TD
(of economic performance over the last two decades. )Tj
0 -13 TD
(A variety of economic, environmental, and biological )Tj
0 -14 TD
(forces continue to impact each subsector differently )Tj
T*
(over time. In terms of sales revenues, ornamental )Tj
T*
(horticulture is currently the largest and fastest )Tj
T*
(growing agricultural subsector in Miami-Dade )Tj
T*
(County. The real market value of horticultural sales )Tj
T*
(grew by more than 39 percent between 1992 and )Tj
T*
(1997, from 177 million to 247 million dollars. The )Tj
0 -13 TD
(number of nursery and greenhouse operations in the )Tj
0 -14 TD
(county increased from 750 in 1989 to 810 in 1998. )Tj
T*
(Foliage production is the largest type of horticultural )Tj
T*
(production within the subsector, followed by potted )Tj
T*
(flowering plants, woody ornamentals, and )Tj
T*
(bedding/garden plants and cut flowers. )Tj
20 -23 Td
(Nearly $214 million in gross sales revenues were )Tj
-20 -14 Td
(generated from the production of twelve different )Tj
T*
(traditional vegetables in Miami-Dade County during )Tj
T*
(the 1997-98 crop season. This represents an 18.1 )Tj
T*
(percent increase in real terms over the 1995-96 crop )Tj
T*
(season as reported in the previous update. The biggest )Tj
T*
(revenue-producing class of traditional vegetables is )Tj
0 -13 TD
(bush and pole beans at $73.5 million. Tomato, with )Tj
0 -14 TD
($44.6 million in revenues, was the next most )Tj
T*
(important traditional vegetables to the county, )Tj
T*
(followed by yellow squash and zucchini \($33.2 )Tj
T*
(million\), potato \($27.5 million\), and sweet corn )Tj
T*
(\($12.8 million\).)Tj
20 -24 Td
(More than twenty tropical and specialty )Tj
-20 -13 Td
(vegetables, including a variety of herbs and spices, )Tj
T*
(are grown in Miami-Dade County. The estimated )Tj
T*
(total value of these tropical vegetables, herbs, and )Tj
T*
(spices sold during the 1997-98 season was about )Tj
T*
($21.7 million. In real terms, this represents a decline )Tj
T*
(of nearly 17 percent from the 1995-96 season and )Tj
T*
(more than 36 percent less than the 1988-89 season. )Tj
0 -13 TD
(Malanga and boniato are responsible for almost 90 )Tj
0 -14 TD
(percent of the revenues for this subsector.)Tj
20 -24 Td
(Revenues from the sales of tropical fruit crops in )Tj
-20 -14 Td
(Miami-Dade County rose to an estimated $73.16 )Tj
T*
(million for the 1997-98 season, up nearly 27 percent )Tj
T*
(in real terms from $57.76 million reported previously )Tj
0 -13 TD
(for the 1995/96 season. Avocado is the leading )Tj
0 -14 TD
(revenue-generating commodity for this subsector, )Tj
T*
(with over $17 million in gross sales for the 1997-98 )Tj
265 653 Td
(season. Other important tropical fruit crops in the )Tj
T*
(county include lychee \($10.4 million\), carambola )Tj
0 -13 TD
(\($9.5 million\), longan \($8.9 million\), persian lime )Tj
0 -14 TD
(\($7.5 million\), mamey sapote \($6.5 million\), and )Tj
T*
(mango \($6.0 million\). It should be noted that future )Tj
T*
(lime production in Miami-Dade County is being )Tj
T*
(seriously jeopardized by an outbreak of citrus canker )Tj
T*
(in 1999.)Tj
20 -24 Td
(There is a highly diverse livestock subsector in )Tj
-20 -13 Td
(Miami-Dade County. Such enterprises range from )Tj
T*
(goat meat production to aquaculture. Based )Tj
T*
(predominantly on Census of Agriculture data, it is )Tj
T*
(estimated that livestock production generated over )Tj
T*
($7.6 million in gross revenues for the county in 1997. )Tj
T*
(Aquaculture represents an important component in )Tj
T*
(this subsector and the economy because, unlike other )Tj
0 -13 TD
(types of livestock production in the county, most )Tj
0 -14 TD
(aquaculture products are sold outside the county.)Tj
/T1_2 13 Tf
81 -25 Td
(References)Tj
/T1_1 11 Tf
-61 -25 Td
(Degner, Robert L., S.M. Moss, and W. David )Tj
-20 -14 Td
(Mulkey. "Economic Impact of Agriculture and )Tj
T*
(Agribusiness in Dade County, Florida." Florida )Tj
0 -13 TD
(Agricultural Market Research Center Industry Report )Tj
0 -14 TD
(97-1. Department of Food and Resource Economics, )Tj
T*
(University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. August )Tj
T*
(1997.)Tj
20 -24 Td
(Moseley, Anne E. et al. "Economic Impact of )Tj
-20 -14 Td
(Agriculture and Agribusiness in Dade County, )Tj
0 -13 TD
(Florida." Florida Agricultural Market Research )Tj
0 -14 TD
(Center Industry Report 90-4. Department of Food and )Tj
T*
(Resource Economics, University of Florida, )Tj
T*
(Gainesville, FL. December 1990.)Tj
ET
/Artifact <>BDC
q
0.6303253 0 0 0.6303253 153 776.9067993 cm
/GS0 gs
/Fm0 Do
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
81 0 obj
<>>>/Resources 84 0 R/Subtype/Form>>stream
0 g 0 G 0 i 0 J []0 d 0 j 1 w 10 M 0 Tc 0 Tw 100 Tz 0 TL 0 Tr 0 Ts
BT
/Arial 11 Tf
0.5 g
0 -8.685 Td
(Archival ) Tj
42.179 0 Td
(copy: ) Tj
29.348 0 Td
(for ) Tj
15.893 0 Td
(current ) Tj
37.291 0 Td
(recommendations ) Tj
90.487 0 Td
(see ) Tj
20.792 0 Td
(http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu ) Tj
107.008 0 Td
(or ) Tj
12.837 0 Td
(your ) Tj
24.455 0 Td
(local ) Tj
25.679 0 Td
(extension ) Tj
50.144 0 Td
(office.) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
82 0 obj
<>
endobj
84 0 obj
<>
endobj
85 0 obj
<>
endobj
86 0 obj
<>
endobj
87 0 obj
<>
endobj
88 0 obj
<>stream
HVyPS>7K'aSdكYY GqD@QQY-bT2VTP[ݠc^ϙ{|= .zÁ/*_B B tľ^>;'w@O eߐ`Fںr uPXJf( 7~DbFw) s1( Gq) MkuM) @π,wO ޮCZ}[ޣx7 \@u x3;MD4 żxV %x2$(~ 1,$(eNdʼnXV̓@Fд]Ń(6Kң[ cc